 |
|

 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Daytime television is extremely bleak. I caught an episode of The Price Is Right this morning. At first everything on the show was as I remembered it from when I was a kid. There were prizes and whoever guessed the amount closest to the prize got a chance to try for another prize. I was disturbed when the show actually tried to play it off like a trip to Scottsdale, Arizona would be something people would actually plan to do on their own - without a funeral or a wedding obligating them to go. At that particular point in the show I was really only watching because I felt compelled to watch by the empty, weird feeling I was starting to get in the pit of my stomach. Eventually on the show an old lady managed to get to the Showcase portion of the show. The first contestant to play the final round was the old lady who was wearing a shirt that said something like, "Bob Barker is Number 1" on the front and "Tony Bennett is Number 2" on the back. The person playing against her was some older dude who didn't seem to be 100% clear on why he was standing on a stage, behind a pink podium. Strangely enough the old lady was behind a baby blue podium. It seemed wrong somehow. Just odd.
So anyway, the name of the game is to guess how much a package of random prizes would cost. The old woman was presented with these two outdoor heating things. The announcer said that they could project heat up to 20 feet away. The woman looked completely baffled by this prize. In fact, I don't even think she ever figured out what exactly the heaters were because she kept looking around and then looking back at the heaters with an expression that implied she had missed more than a couple of beats. The next prize was a chair. It was a reddish/pinkish lazy boy chair but it wasn't even a big, comfortable looking chair because when the model sat in it she didn't completely fit. That isn't a good thing considering the models are skinny. There were some other completely useless prizes but they escape my memory just now. The only thing of value was the car at the end. The car, which was a cadillac, was the only prize of any value. The old lady looked very taken aback by the car. I am fairly sure she was probably so old that she no longer even drives. She had those big bottle-cap glasses on that make a person's eyes look twice their real size. She also had trouble walking. I don't think a car was going to do her any good if she won it. She would have to sell it and I am sure she wasn't thinking that far ahead.
The man's prizes seemed a little better except the audience actually booed when they showed his first prize, which was a bedroom set. Then they showed a plasma television. I was thinking that the old lady probably would have liked that one better because it was really big and she could actually see it as opposed to some of her own weirdo prizes that she would never even have occasion to use. The man's last gift was a snow mobile. He actually got really excited over that. I figured that after seeing the old lady get the car in her package he would want one of his own, but he seemed content with the idea of the snow mobile.
Anyway, the man ended up winning. The old lady over-bid (but she was close!). It took her a few minutes to figure out she had lost, which was hard, on an emotional level, to watch...
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Extreme boredom leads to some ridiculously wasteful uses of time. For example, when I have nothing better to do I spend a lot of time trying to find movies to add to my netflix queue. It's a project in and of itself because it isn't like going to Blockbuster and having lots of movie covers presented to you, just waiting to be glanced over, rejected, scrutinized, pondered, laughed at (there are some amusing taglines and pictures especially with regard to the lower grade of movie), etc. On netflix you are at the mercy of the site which allows you to click on new releases, recommendations, and a few other poorly thought-out resources.
So when I saw "Werewolves on Wheels" listed on one such site I was thrilled. A title like that is good for so many things. The first thing I did was text David to tell him that he should watch the mail because the very next movie we would receive would undoubtedly be "Werewolves on Wheels". He is rather gullible, not to mention choosy when it comes to what movies he is willing to watch, so I knew this would be like shooting fish in a barrel. His reply was simply, "Ok!" and then a very delayed, "Do you mind explaining to me WHY that movie is coming?" To which I responded: "I dunno." He asked for a description and not thinking the real one (I hadn't even read it yet) would offer enough amusement I wrote this, "Provocative, yet ominous tale about a trek through the Australian Outback gone horribly wrong." I should have just used the real description because it turns out that it was much, much better. Behold:
"What happens when a motorcycle gang known as the Devil's Advocates sets off on a take-no-prisoners tour of the American Southwest? Well, for one thing, two of its members (Stephen Oliver and D.J. Anderson) meet up with a cult of satanic monks who promptly turn them into werewolves. An improbable marriage of road movie and horror flick, this offbeat film marks the directorial debut of Michel Levesque, who also penned the screenplay."
It is the part about the satanic monks that kind of makes you sit up and go, "Heh?"
I looked for member reviews on the movie and there was just one. It states:
"This is a guilty pleasure. The movie sucks but if you like the title and the concept there are gonna be parts of this curio that will amuse you.Billy Gray who appeared on Father Knows Best TV series and Barry Macguire who did the legendary protest song Eve Of Destruction are two of the filthy, iconoclastic bikers that unknowingly crash out at a satanic temple run by the ever eccentric Severn Darden( The Presidents Analyst).About half of the film appears to be improvised and if it's not they should say it is and be warned you aint gonna see the hog ridin' fur bags till the last five minutes of the picture.For all of it's faults it's still an insignificant and goofy bit of fun, a little slow but a reminder of the days when you could get away with any kind of mixed metaphor to get your product into the drive-in."
You can actually click a button to rate whether the member's input was "helpful" or "not helpful". I first have to say that the use of the word iconoclastic to describe this movie in any way, shape, or form seems like an abomination somehow. I can't decide whether the above review was helpful or not so I will have to defer responding to that. 3 out of 3 members voted that it was helpful but they could have been related to this person who calls themself "Dukey the Movie Clown" with a link that invites you to read other reviews Dukey has done. Which is tempting. Except I have to get back to work.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



|
 |
|
 |